Contrast: Programmatic w/ Bio (Treated), Null Comparison (Control)

Treatment Cases:
477
Control Cases:
4935

Figure 1. Mean Estimated Impacts from Causal Tree and Random Forest Estimation Strategies.

In this illustration, the blue vertical line is the global estimate of impact from the random forest. The range of uncertainty is illustrated using a histogram, indicating the proportion of simulations which result in positive or negative estimates. Specific confidence intervals can be calculated for this global estimate, or for individual project locations. A map of project location uncertainties is presented below.

Descriptive Statistics for Programmatic w/ Bio (Treated)
StatisticMeanSt. Dev.MinMedianMax
Dist. to Rivers (m)91,565.091,023,069.00789.712,105.9515,768,872.00
Dist. to Roads (m)29,882.72177,439.20172.553,155.102,772,627.00
Elevation (m)556.73683.14-0.20372.304,687.19
Slope (degrees)2.724.050.000.9323.31
Urb. Dist. (rel)415.57602.216.95237.315,112.51
Pop. Density (2000)182.43451.570.0357.286,888.64
Protected Area %55.5997.310.000.00384.74
Treecover (2000, %)18.1027.860.001.6499.73
Latitude18.6013.15-21.3515.3249.16
Longitude42.6452.05-169.9616.51171.15
Max Precip. (2002, mm)214.72147.992.65185.811,035.42
Min Precip (2002, mm)6.9819.630.000.00182.80
Mean Precip (2002, mm)74.3458.130.5258.08321.83
Max Temp (2002, C)28.635.271.6228.6638.75
Min Temp (2002, C)14.9011.67-28.6020.5027.34
Mean Temp (2002, C)22.187.44-7.9425.3230.59
Nightime Lights (2002, Relative)3.107.460.000.0660.72
NDVI (2002, Unitless)1,920.45758.50394.971,810.883,993.96
years since implementation1.721.62025
Programmatic w/ Bio1.000.00111
NDVI Diff pre-post implementation-27.38138.21-583.75-23.42449.90
Propensity Model: Programmatic w/ Bio (Treated), Null Comparison (Control)
Dependent variable:
treatment
Dist. to Rivers (m)0.0000*** (0.0000, 0.0000)
Dist. to Roads (m)-0.0000* (-0.0000, 0.0000)
Elevation (m)0.0002* (-0.0000, 0.0005)
Slope (degrees)0.03 (-0.01, 0.08)
Urb. Dist. (rel)-0.001*** (-0.001, -0.001)
Pop. Density (2000)0.0003* (-0.0000, 0.001)
Protected Area %0.004*** (0.003, 0.01)
Treecover (2000, %)0.002 (-0.005, 0.01)
Latitude0.04*** (0.03, 0.05)
Longitude0.01*** (0.01, 0.01)
Max Precip. (2002, mm)0.0002 (-0.002, 0.002)
Min Precip (2002, mm)-0.01** (-0.02, -0.002)
Mean Precip (2002, mm)0.002 (-0.003, 0.01)
Max Temp (2002, C)0.09* (-0.002, 0.19)
Min Temp (2002, C)0.19*** (0.11, 0.26)
Mean Temp (2002, C)-0.18** (-0.35, -0.02)
Nightime Lights (2002, Relative)0.01 (-0.01, 0.04)
NDVI (2002, Unitless)-0.0005*** (-0.001, -0.0003)
years since implementation-0.27*** (-0.34, -0.21)
Constant-3.13*** (-4.36, -1.90)
Observations5,028
Akaike Inf. Crit.2,437.27
Note:*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01
Percent Balance Improvement:
Mean Diff.eQQ MedeQQ MeaneQQ Max
Propensity Score96.13496.60295.70887.961
Dist. to Rivers (m)5.260-72.4911.522-1.158
Dist. to Roads (m)71.14438.37962.90977.881
Elevation (m)99.33364.79874.60850.287
Slope (degrees)66.793-5.119-27.451-19.555
Urb. Dist. (rel)92.83659.82772.13690.645
Pop. Density (2000)62.55825.65342.9300
Protected Area %92.127084.68147.142
Treecover (2000, %)92.80078.35071.01656.968
Latitude81.58166.26063.16063.868
Longitude84.65213.04628.585-0.421
Max Precip. (2002, mm)69.88336.50223.09435.921
Min Precip (2002, mm)97.64510060.50761.199
Mean Precip (2002, mm)23.29125.44516.30775.805
Max Temp (2002, C)96.96882.90078.71515.960
Min Temp (2002, C)95.13876.29778.21874.221
Mean Temp (2002, C)98.43085.39984.14367.944
Nightime Lights (2002, Relative)58.763056.10733.835
NDVI (2002, Unitless)69.36758.45945.77115.847
years since implementation90.98910071.83150
Matched Model: Programmatic w/ Bio (Treated), Null Comparison (Control)
Dependent variable:
NDVI Diff pre-post implementation
treatment-0.01 (-0.07, 0.05)
Dist. to Rivers (m)-0.31 (-0.93, 0.31)
Dist. to Roads (m)0.07** (0.01, 0.14)
Elevation (m)-0.25*** (-0.36, -0.15)
Slope (degrees)-0.14*** (-0.23, -0.05)
Urb. Dist. (rel)0.10*** (0.02, 0.17)
Pop. Density (2000)0.02 (-0.06, 0.11)
Protected Area %-0.03 (-0.09, 0.03)
Treecover (2000, %)0.16*** (0.06, 0.27)
Latitude-0.07 (-0.25, 0.10)
Longitude-0.23*** (-0.32, -0.14)
Max Precip. (2002, mm)-0.46*** (-0.64, -0.29)
Min Precip (2002, mm)0.01 (-0.08, 0.10)
Mean Precip (2002, mm)0.27** (0.06, 0.48)
Max Temp (2002, C)-0.20 (-0.51, 0.11)
Min Temp (2002, C)-0.27 (-0.81, 0.27)
Mean Temp (2002, C)-0.11 (-0.83, 0.61)
Nightime Lights (2002, Relative)-0.002 (-0.08, 0.08)
NDVI (2002, Unitless)-0.07 (-0.16, 0.02)
years since implementation-0.05* (-0.12, 0.01)
Urb. Dist. (rel) *Treatment-0.05 (-0.12, 0.02)
Dist. to Rivers (m) *Treatment0.25 (-0.37, 0.87)
Dist. to Roads (m) *Treatment-0.02 (-0.09, 0.05)
Pop. Density (2000) *Treatment-0.01 (-0.07, 0.06)
Latitude *Treatment-0.002 (-0.17, 0.17)
Longitude *Treatment0.005 (-0.09, 0.09)
NDVI (2002, Unitless) *Treatment-0.03 (-0.12, 0.06)
Elevation (m) *Treatment-0.04 (-0.14, 0.07)
Slope (degrees) *Treatment-0.04 (-0.13, 0.06)
Treecover (2000, %) *Treatment0.12** (0.01, 0.22)
Max Temp (2002, C) *Treatment0.19 (-0.12, 0.50)
Mean Temp (2002, C) *Treatment-0.40 (-1.12, 0.32)
Min Temp (2002, C) *Treatment0.18 (-0.36, 0.72)
Max Precip. (2002, mm) *Treatment0.19** (0.01, 0.36)
Mean Precip (2002, mm) *Treatment-0.17 (-0.38, 0.04)
Min Precip (2002, mm) *Treatment0.04 (-0.05, 0.13)
Protected Area % *Treatment-0.04 (-0.10, 0.03)
years since implementation *Treatment-0.06* (-0.12, 0.01)
Constant-0.01 (-0.07, 0.05)
Observations870
R20.33
Adjusted R20.30
Note:*p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01

Standardized Beta Coefficients for Linear Model with Heterogeneous Effects